I am an architect and I am a dad.
I’m lots of other things as well – a husband, a small business owner, a writer, a teacher, a runner – but these two things (together with being a husband) represent the biggest and most important part of me. They demand the lion’s share of my waking life and I dedicate to them the lion’s share of my passions and energy.
For many parents, both men and women, the separation of these roles is reinforced by any number of influences: the physical act of leaving one’s home to go to work; the contrasting mental spaces required to work and to parent; fossilised attitudes within the workplace; even the desire to safeguard the efficiency of work and preciousness of family. The latter was certainly the case for my parents, who put great effort while I was growing up into protecting the bookends of the day.
Deservedly, this subject has received a lot of recent attention in lecture, institution and media circles. The gender discussion is multifaceted, but revolves predominantly around equity, work / life balance and family. Thanks to excellent research conducted by Parlour, we know that women disappear from the profession as they get older. We know that disparity between the career progression of men and women still exists. And we know that long hours and poor pay remain a systemic problem within the industry, conditions that prohibit the balance of work and family.
But this is not my experience.
For me, the presence of women in the workplace, together with a flexible, family-friendly approach to working hours are the norm. After graduating, I worked at Perkins Architects where half the twelve architecture staff were women, where part time work for returning mothers was encouraged, and where the day started at nine and finished at six. Since establishing Mihaly Slocombe in 2010 with my wife, Erica Slocombe, these conditions have endured. We work from home, enjoy flexible working hours, wrap up by six, and our son, Oscar, is an important (if sometimes destructive) part of the studio environment.
This is not to say that we are world’s best practice. We don’t have an official gender or family policy. Plenty of the choices that have lead to our current work / life balance have been unconscious. And our parenting roles are in many ways based on traditional gender divisions. We are not driven by a fervour for gender equity, we just live and work in a fluid way that feels right.
I wonder if this is a commonplace arrangement? Since so many architects at some point start their own practice, surely my experience is not unique. Surely there are other archidads out there sharing the parenting load… Which is why I’m writing this article. Amidst all of the wonderful energy devoted to revealing and correcting the gender imbalance and poor working conditions that we know persist in our profession, the role of working men in parenting seems to be a less popular subject. While the picture we have of working mothers is highly detailed, the one of working fathers is blurry at best.
I’d like to share my story in the hope that it provides some (tiny) measure of balance to the gender discussion. There is no doubt that the old boys club, unconscious bias and the glass ceiling are men’s shame to bear, but when I reflect on my dual identities as architect and dad, or should I say, co-identities, I am struck by how unlike the traditional caricature of male architects my life is.
Location, location, location
More than anything, this distinction is enabled by the location of the Mihaly Slocombe studio in our spare bedroom. Working from home means work and family flow into one another: I am around my family, and my family are around my work, all the time. Design presentations, emails and piles of drawings overlap with play, songs and piles of toys. There is a shifting but ever-present colony of Matchbox cars in every corner of our house, my desk included.
My day would not be complete without at least one stint of working with Daddy time, memorable sessions involving Oscar perched on my lap while he navigates my iPhone with unnerving aptitude and I try valiantly to tap away at my keyboard around him. Meetings and deadlines are scheduled around nap times, dance class and nanny days. Making any decision in our work life means negotiating the needs of our family life, and vice versa.
I even muse sometimes what influence this will have on Jake, our graduate architect. He takes part in the rituals of family lunch most days; he gets to enjoy Oscar’s regular visits to our studio space and interchangeable demands for John Lennon’s Give Peace a Chance and Craig Smith’s timeless The Wonky Donkey; he arrives in the morning to tales of sleep deprivation; he has watched Oscar grow from a baby into a toddler.
While working from home began as a decision to reduce our operating costs, it has evolved into an essential ingredient in the way we do business. This might strike many as highly counterproductive. And it’s true that a different office environment might facilitate greater profitability (as might slogging away at work 10 hours a day, 7 days a week). But in Oscar’s three years, I’ve never found the blurring of my identities to be a problem.
The practice of architecture has always expanded and contracted to fill the gaps in my life. All the way back to my primary school years, sketching houses was a weekend hobby. I undertook my first project commission while studying at university, and my second while working four days a week at Perkins. As a dad, architecture continues to bend and sway, to take place when it can and must.
I recognise this situation won’t last. Erica, Jake and I work 10 full time equivalent days between us, some of which overlap with us all working together. Our spare bedroom studio is very comfortable for two, but the third is challenging. Adding even one additional staff member would be impossible. But when a career first takes shape as a primary school hobby, even the difficult bits are imbued with a lustre of ease. I’m incredibly lucky to feel like this, I know, and recognise that for vast swathes of Australia, work is a chore. But for me, it’s just not. I love my family. I love architecture. While I still can, why in the world would I want to keep them separate?
Shared decision making
To use an old (somewhat gender-stereotypical) saying, it’s hard to say who in our family wears the pants. The same goes for our practice. As the primary carer, Erica is the expert on Oscar and so drives most decisions concerning him. As the primary businessperson, I drive most decisions concerning Mihaly Slocombe. But we are fortunate to enjoy both a work and life partnership where neither of us makes those decisions independently. The pants therefore are either large enough to fit us both, or we hop about wearing one leg each.
Ownership of our projects is also shared, as is any sense of individual authorship. This has only become more evident since Jake came on board two years ago, whose critical design input through modelling, detailing and documentation have come to reshape our design process.
Is this sharing of responsibilities rare or is it the norm? I’ve never canvassed opinion amongst either my friends or work colleagues, though it’s likely there exists a whole spectrum of structures. I do know it makes me uncomfortable watching Mad Men’s Donald Draper make executive decisions for his family. Perhaps it should be the norm. It is no coincidence that Parlour considers issues of gender equity as the canary in the coalmine for the whole architecture profession, women and men inclusive. We’re all in this together.
Writing this article has inspired me to reconsider my work and life ambitions. With a new baby on the way, and all the attendant furniture that will inevitably accompany her, the idea of keeping our studio at home has become more tenuous. But it’s an arrangement I hope we can retain, at least until Oscar and his baby sister head off to school, as it allows me to be the sort of parent I want to be. I like being around, listening all day to the sounds of Oscar’s play even if I’m not directly part of it. I like the zero commute time, the morning hustle to get the house ready for its use as a studio, and then the evening hustle to finish off work in time for dinner at 6pm.
When Erica returns to being a full time mum next year, having our studio at home will also enable her to remain connected to the work of the architecture practice that bears her name. Just as I am around Oscar all day, she will be around our work all day. Quick questions can be fielded, clients can be greeted, progress discussions can be had over lunch.
When I think about it, isn’t this what the entire gender discussion boils down to? How can we, as individuals living in a contemporary, egalitarian society, live our lives so the parts are in balance with one another? Working long hours sucks. Spending evenings locked up in the office sucks. Working the right amount to contribute meaningfully to the broader community while still dedicating the right amount of time to my family feels great.
I like my life.
This article is co-published on Parlour, an online resource on women, equity and architecture.
- Around 45% of architects in their twenties are women. This number declines to less than 10% for architects over 55 years of age. Statistics sourced from Gill Matthewson; The numbers so far; Parlour; March 2012.
- I refer here to the general tone of the gender equity discussion. Since I am by no means an expert, I may be entirely wrong here. Please feel free to correct me if I am.
- At work with Oscar, author’s own image.
- Matchbox cars, author’s own image.
- Playing shops, author’s own image.
- On site with Oscar, author’s own image.
A beautiful article. I have never understood the maxim many architects have of : “Architects have children. We just dont talk about them”. Why?? If we DID talk about them, it would help us all.
The long work hours for no additional pay is really a global problem. I personally worked till 9pm most weekdays while employed overseas and was told that “if people with families can stay, why can’t you (as a single woman)?”. And if we worked weekends (for a competition deadline) all we got was a meal allowance. I kid you not. You can imagine why I was only too happy to relocate to Australia after that initial experience.
I was fortunate to be employed from 9-5.30 most days for a local practice in Melbourne. However, tales from friends abound about working till 8pm “most days except fridays” (no mention of overtime pay) here too. And guess what? When I did have a child and had to make decisions to prioritize her – such as the client email that arrived at 5:15 p.m. (will have to wait the next day to be answered) or not been given a particular project because children fall sick and ‘this client/project is too important for any delays’. I do not look for inequality, but when it creeps up on your over time – you have to eventually stare it in the face.
It is thus no small co-incidence that I am now the happiest I have ever been – after a decade in architecture – within the sanctuary that is private practice. It is undoubtedly hard. And I might not have landed here if not for the most amazing business partner in the world. It does not surprise me in the least that Parlour surveys show a high proportion of the women who do survive the long haul are either sole practitioners or directors of small firms.
For me, it boiled down to this. Leaving my daughter to be looked after in childcare was hard. If I am to leave her there, IS the work and role that I am doing worth it? Lets put aside the pay issue for a moment. Is the WORK worth it? Very often the (paid) role itself isnt. But in private practice my work FEELS imbued with greater purpose and agency. Driving to work now I dont find myself dreading the workday but excited about what lies ahead.
I now have the choice to pick up my daughter early and to include her in my office time. I am doing this partly as a way of transitioning into less daycare hours for her, but also because like you I WANT her to be a part of my day.
And I am so happy for you. Everyone should like their life. Thank you so much for writing about this.
Hi Sonia, thank you for your great feedback. Glad to learn you too have found the right balance in work and life, something to discuss next time we catch up.
Just a note to say you’re not alone. Half-way around the world, I’m in a similar situation. Operating out of a home office and tending to my two sons between the time my wife leaves for the train in the morning and I take them to school, and then collect them and prep dinner before she’s back. It makes for a slightly shorter ‘primary’ work day, but after the kids are in bed I can head back up to the office for a few hours. Prior to starting my own practice I worked for several renowned firms in New York. Sure I’d like to working on larger commissions, but the prestige of working on major projects doesn’t balance out the personal sacrifices. I’m happy to say that 2 years in, I wouldn’t go back.
I think we’re at an interesting time. One in which traditional gender roles are mixed up. Over the span of our marriage, my wife and I have both held the primary breadwinner status at some point – she is currently back in the lead. We also have limited roll models. While my father was a loving and engaged dad, he was of the ‘Don Draper’ generation. Off for work before I woke up and home in time for his dinner to be served to him. I secretly think it was easier for his generation.
Best wishes to you, your family and your practice.
Thanks for your input, Dan. I agree that expectations for our social / gender / workplace structures are much more complex today than ever before. I suspect most workplaces haven’t caught up at all, but it’s an exciting time to watch the transition. It sounds like you and your wife are way ahead of the curve!
Enjoyed it very much Warwick! Resonated with my experience as a sole-practitioner for 22+ years and the last 14 of those from a home office (thankfully with a separate entry and courtyard between me and the house)…with two children (9 & 5yo) and my wife working 3 ‘full’ days a week (nurse) means I am also as much a part of my children’s lives as mum is. Works well…
Thanks Warwick. I like your article, it’s great to hear a positive male perspective in a family. I have 2 school age children, my husband and I work from home. He is not an architect, and works much longer hours than I do, but working from home is a huge advantage for our family. The current political system and financial markets encourage increased productivity, and a fundamental method of achieving this is encouraging more women to undertake full time work. Whilst I feel all people should have the opportunity to work, I also feel that all people should have the opportunity to be a part of their family, and in my view, having both parents working full time makes family life less joyous, and less fulfilling. I am a proponent of the 4 day working week for everyone. We seem to have moved from a 19th century social model of men working 5 days, and women looking after a household, to a model where everyone works all the time, as though somehow children and houses do not require time….something we all know is nonsense. I hope that men and women can work together to find a more equitable model for everyone. One day!
Great point Rosemary. From the 5 day working week for one parent to both parents. We’ve definitely lost sight of something important there.
I stumbled across your blog, intrigued on what you had to say above then the cogs started turning and realized your wife and my sister were friends through primary/high school! Such a small world, an odd thing to stumble across and so great to read what a fabulously balanced life Erica (and you) are living! I am in the same industry and although every employer I have worked with says they are family friendly, the reality always falls far from, in my mind, what family friendly really means!
Bravo to the both of you!
I hope to find such a balance, but being an employee makes this MUCH harder a reality to achieve!
Thanks for your comment, I agree that finding the balance will working for others is trickier. Parlour is doing some great work trying to raise awareness of this within the profession, and hopefully affect positive change.
You’ll have to let me know what your sister’s name is so I can pass the message onto Erica!